For newcomers to the commons wishing to acquaint themselves with Elinor Ostrom’s work, it can be a hard slog. Her scholarly treatises, while often quite insightful, can be quite dense in delivering their hard research results and refined insights. It is a real pleasure, therefore, to greet Sustaining the Commons, a new undergraduate textbook that has just been published. The book provides a general overview of the intellectual framework, concepts and applications of Ostrom’s research on the commons.
Best of all, in a refreshing departure from most academic publishing, the authors of the 168-page book decided to make it available for free as a downloadable pdf file. Just go to the book’s website and blog, http://sustainingthecommons.asu.edu.
Sustaining the Commons is by John M. Anderies and Marco A. Janssen, both associate professors at Arizona State University and directors of the Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity, which is the publisher of the textbook. Both authors worked with Ostrom from 2000 until her death in 2012. Although Ostrom’s name is mostly associated with Indiana University, where she co-founded and ran the Workshop on Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Ostrom was also a part-time research professor at ASU from 2006-2012.
Anderies and Janssen taught a course at ASU on Ostrom’s work, with a special focus on her books Governing the Commons (1990) and Understanding Institutional Diversity (2005). Out of that teaching arose the idea for this book. Ostrom herself saw and approved of the first draft of the book in April 2012, shortly before her death.
The book is a lucid, logically presented introduction to the key concepts of Ostrom’s research. There are chapters on “defining institutions,” “action arenas and action situations,” and “social dilemmas.” There are also a series of case studies on the management of various types of common-pool resources – water, forests, domesticated animals – and a review of “design principles to sustain the commons.”
There are a number of chapters on human behavior as it is studied by social science. How do people make decisions about collective matters and how do they develop trust? How are these behaviors studied in the laboratory? What sorts of rules and social norms matter?
These are all elements of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework, a standard research methodology for investigating commons regimes as they exist in diverse contexts. In essence, the IAD is a meta-theoretical framework that lets researchers assess diverse variables in commons from different disciplinary perspectives.
A final section on “applying the framework” looks at how Ostrom’s framework applies to public health, the digital commons and sport. It’s a useful exercise, but I confess that I found the chapter on digital commons a bit thin. For example, it didn’t adequately differentiate corporate-owned platforms for sharing (Facebook, Google) from commons-based ones (Wikipedia, free software). The authors also seem to swallow the film industry's propaganda line about copyright theft -- that stealing a DVD is the same as using online content without permission. (Anderies and Janssen: “To illegally obtain a music recording 40 years ago, it was necessary to walk into a record store and walk out with a vinyl disc! Again, before the Internet, stealing was a more personal affair—you had to actually see the victim.”) This begs the question of whether copyright actually does prohibit unauthorized uses -- the fair use doctrine, which authorizes re-use and copying, is routinely ignored by copyright industries. Nor does this framing consider whether copyright law should continue to be as extensive and long-lived as it is, at the expense of the commons.
Still, give some credit where it is due: Sustaining the Commons is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-No Derivatives license. Despite a few lapses, Sustaining the Commons is a welcome addition to the literature that provides a succinct, clear-headed introduction to Lin Ostrom’s formidable research. Download it now!
Vincent Ostrom, von Mises, and Hayek
I went to Wikipedia to learn a bit more about Elinor Ostrom and discovered that her husband, Vincent, died shortly after she did. Curious, I clicked on the link for Vincent Ostrom and was more than a little bit surprised to read that (allegedly) much of the Ostrom's work was based "on the work of early 20th century political economists like Frank Wright, Ludwig von Mises, and Friedrich von Hayek." I associate von Mises and von Hayek with right-wing libertarianism - I'd sure like to know how Vincent Ostrom incorporated their thinking into his work, unless his work is diametrically opposed to that of his wife.